Comparison of Non-Vegetarians and Vegetarians Essay - 2

Comparison of Non-Vegetarians and Vegetarians - Essay ExampleBeing a vegetarian or non-vegetarian is an individuals decision. Both categories have their individualistic pros and cons. The desire to be a vegetarian comes from a myriad of sources which include a wish to stay levelheaded, live green and remain smart. There is a general perception that consumption of vegetarian food keeps ones weight in control because of the cut intake of fat. There is a significant population of vegetarians who consider it unlawful to slaughter animals or birds to run down them irrespective of the prevailing laws in the country. They consider it wrong ethically. According to them, just because humans have more than brains and power as compared to other animals and birds does not deprive other species of their right to survival and existence. Being a vegetarian deprives an individual of a whole range of foods that are made of meat. Accordingly, the range of flavors with which the vegetarians can pla y to modernise different tastes in different dishes is limited. Vegetarians are generally smarter as compared to the non-vegetarians because some of the most common and effectiveness sources of fat including butter and cream that are derived from animals are excluded from their diet. Research suggests that vegetarians, both men, and women, have a higher(prenominal) IQ level as compared to the non-vegetarians (BBC, 2006). The desire to be a non-vegetarian fundamentally emerges from the love of meat, though there are also other factors that play a role including a wish to stay healthy and strong. There is a general perception that consumption of non-vegetarian food facilitates the development of muscles and lends the body more brawny strength. Non-vegetarians do not consider it ethically wrong to slaughter animals and birds to eat them.